Decision date
3 March 2026
Tribunal
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Case Summary
The Attorney General applied for a restriction of proceedings order against Ms Sandra Messi under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, on the basis that she is a vexatious litigant. The Employment Appeal Tribunal reviewed Ms Messi's extensive litigation history and determined that the test for a restriction order was satisfied.
Why this outcome?
Vexatious conductThe Employment Appeal Tribunal found that Ms Messi satisfied the test for a restriction of proceedings order under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, based on her extensive litigation history demonstrating vexatious conduct.
Claim Types
Key Issues
- •vexatious litigation
- •abuse of process
Related Cases
Decision Text
Judgment approved by the court for handing down The Attorney General v Ms Sandra Messi © EAT 2026 Page 1 [2026] EAT 34 Neutral Citation Number: [2026] EAT 34 Case No: EA-2025-000003-RN EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 03 March 2026 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SHELDON MISS EMMA LENEHAN MR NICK AZIZ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Applicant - and – MS SANDRA MESSI Respondent - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Richard Boyle (instructed by Government Legal Department) for the Applicant The Respondent represented herself, but made no oral representations Hearing date: 18 th December 2025 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the court for handing down The Attorney General v Ms Sandra Messi © EAT 2026 Page 2 [2026] EAT 34 SUMMARY Practice and Procedure His Majesty’s Attorney General applied for a restriction of proceedings order against Ms Sandra Messi under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 (“the ETA”), on the basis that she is a vexatious litigant. Section 33 of the ETA permits the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) to impose a restriction order where a person has habitually and persistently and without reasonable ground instituted vexatious proceedings or made vexatious applications. The EAT reviewed extensive materials evidencing Ms Messi’s …
Something doesn't look right?
Report a wrong claim type, outcome, summary, or award.
Case Details
- Claimant
- The Attorney General
- Case No.
- [2026] EAT 34
- Appeal
- Appeal outcome unclear
- Tribunal
- Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Level
- Appeal
- Decision
- 3 March 2026
- Published
- 3 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Representation
- Litigant in person