Back to search
[2025] EAT 199unknown

Monique Francois

5 December 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Housego
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant, a black woman with a physical disability, claimed that she was discriminated against when decision makers refused to make a discretionary payment to her during sickness absence, which had earlier been paid to another female employee who was white and neurodiverse.

Key Issues

  • discretionary payment during sickness absence

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 section 13Employment Rights Act 1996

a claim of direct race discrimination and a claim for unlawful deductions from wages. The appeal in respect of the latter was withdrawn i

Equality Act 2010 disability discriminationEquality Act 2010

disabled. It is less likely that they would engage in disability discrimination when they go out of their way to support disabled peopl

Equality Act 2010 race discriminationEquality Act 2010

two with which I was concerned were a claim of direct race discrimination and a claim for unlawful deductions from wages. The ap

Decision Text

Judgment approved by the court Stay Safe East v Monique Francois © EAT 2025 Page 1 [2025] EAT 199 Neutral Citation Number: [2025] EAT 199 Case No: EA-2024-000929-RN EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: 5 December 2025 Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE BARKLEM --------------------- Between: STAY SAFE EAST Appellant - and - MONIQUE FRANCOIS Respondent --------------------- --------------------- Mr Rad Kohanzad (instructed by Croner) for the Appellant Mr Adam Ohringer (instructed by TSUT Carpenters Group) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 3 & 5 December 2025 --------------------- JUDGMENT Judgment approved by the court Stay Safe East v Monique Francois © EAT 2025 Page 2 [2025] EAT 199 SUMMARY Discrimination An employment tribunal rejected an unopposed application to adjourn a full hearing. The claimant’s witness statement had not been received in advance of the hearing by the respondent or the tribunal itself. There was considerable oral augmentation of that statement. The respondent’s representative was unable to attend the actual hearing. The claimant’s claim was that, in a discriminatory way, decision makers refused to make a discretionary payment to her, (a black woman with a physical disability) during sickness absence, which had earlier been paid to another female employee who was white and neurodiverse, The tribunal’s written reasons do not set out the relevant law other than by referen...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Monique Francois

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
[2025] EAT 199
Tribunal
Employment Appeal Tribunal
Level
Appeal
Decision Date
05/12/2025
Published
24/02/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Housego