Muzo Clinic

1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms S Boardman Respondent: Muzo Clinic Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 18 August 2025 Before: Employment Judge Jones Representation Claimant: in person Respondent: Mr L Marsh (Director) The claim being uncontested, the judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: JUDGMENT Notice Pay (1) The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded. (2) The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £9,250.00 (£37,000/12 x 3) as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the Claimant will have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. Holiday Pay (3) The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The Respondent made an authorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages by failing to pay the Claimant for holidays accrued but 2 not taken on the date the Claimant’s employment ended. (4) This also includes holiday pay accrued during the notice period. (5) The Respondent shall pay the Claimant £770.83 (102.77 x 7.5 days). (6) The Claimant is responsible for paying any tax or National Insurance due on these sums. Total (7) The Respondent is to pay the Claimant the total sum of £770.83 + £9,250 = 10,020.83. Employment Judge Jones Dated: 19 August 2025 Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s...