West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Case Summary
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's direct race and religion and belief discrimination and harassment claims as they were out of time. The unfair dismissal (constructive) claim was also dismissed.
Key Issues
- •direct race and religion and belief discrimination and harassment related to race and religion and belief are out of time
- •unfair dismissal (constructive) claim
Claim Types
Decision Text
& 3304143/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R Mohamed Razick Respondent: West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal On: 21,22,23,24 and 25 July 2025 Before: Employment Judge Alliott Members: Mr P Miller Mr A Scott Representation Claimant: Ms Sarah Vyse (lay representative) Respondent: Ms Daisy van den Berg (counsel) JUDGMENT The judgment of the tribunal is that: 1. The claimant’s direct race and religion and belief discrimination and harassment related to race and religion and belief are out of time and it is not just and equitable to extend time. Consequently, there is no jurisdiction to hear them, and they are dismissed. 2. The claimant’s unfair dismissal (constructive) claim is dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Alliott Date: 1 August 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 3 September 2025 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Record...
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- Healthcare
- Representation
- Legally represented
Case Details
- Case Number
- 3303718/2023
- Decision Date
- 01/08/2025
- Published
- 16/10/2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott