Back to search
2500668/2023settled

Newcastle University

22 October 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Langridge
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The case involved claims of maternity and pregnancy discrimination, unfair dismissal, notice pay, and redundancy payment. All claims were withdrawn or dismissed on the grounds of time limits, withdrawal, or lack of reasonable prospect of success.

Key Issues

  • EDT determination
  • time limit for second claim
  • strike out of discrimination claims

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

olved claims of maternity and pregnancy discrimination, unfair dismissal, notice pay, and redundancy payment. All claims were wi

Equality Act 2010 race discriminationEquality Act 2010

the grounds of sex, pregnancy/maternity and race. The race discrimination claim has previously been dismissed on withdrawal. 2

Equality Act 2010 sex / pregnancy discriminationEquality Act 2010

The case involved claims of maternity and pregnancy discrimination, unfair dismissal, notice pay, and redundancy payment.

Working Time Regulations 1998Working Time Regulations 1998

e P45 was processed on 23 May, and the accrued holiday pay was paid on 31 May, do not determine the EDT. They are

Decision Text

Case Nos: 2500668/2023 & 2502011/2023 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Miss R Olyazadeh Respondent Newcastle University Heard at Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre On 25 October 2023 (In chambers 29 November 2023) Before Employment Judge Langridge Representation: Claimant In person Respondent Mr Robert Allen, counsel JUDGMENT 1) The claimant's complaints under for maternity and pregnancy discrimination are dismissed on withdrawal. 2) The claimant's complaints under case number 2500668/2023 of unfair dismissal and for notice pay are dismissed on withdrawal. 3) The claimant's complaints under both case numbers 2500668/2023 and 2502011/2023 for a redundancy payment are dismissed on withdrawal. 4) The claimant's complaints under case number 2502011/2023 of unfair dismissal and for notice pay were not presented within the applicable time limit. It was reasonably practicable to do so. Those complaints are therefore dismissed. 5) The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims under Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 is refused. Case Nos: 2500668/2023 & 2502011/2023 2 REASONS Introduction 1. Today’s public preliminary hearing was listed to deal with various issues arising from the two claim forms submitted by the claimant. The first ET1 was brought under case number 2500668/2023 (‘the first claim’). It was submitted on 3 April 2023, while the claimant's employment was continuing. The complaints raised in the first claim were for unfair dismissal, notice pay, a statutory redundancy payment; and discrimination on the grounds of sex, pregnancy/maternity and race. The race discrimination claim has previously been dismissed on withdrawal. 2. On 29 August 2023 the ...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Newcastle University

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
2500668/2023
Decision Date
22/10/2025
Published
01/12/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Langridge