Currys Group Ltd
Case Summary
Employment Judge WILSON ruled that Michael Edwards was not unfairly dismissed by Currys Group Limited.
Claim Types
Decision Text
Case No: 3313160/2023 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: MICHAEL EDWARDS Respondent: CURRYS GROUP LIMITED Heard at: WATFORD ET On: 7-8 November 2024 Before: EJ WILSON (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr Williams JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that the claimant was not unfairly dismissed by the respondent. His claim of unfair dismissal fails and is dismissed. _____________________________ Employment Judge WILSON Date: 8/11/24 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 14/12/2024 N Gotecha FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- Case No: 3313160/2023 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 February 2018 tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case. Recording and Transcription Please note that if a Tribunal hearing has been recorded you may request a transcript of the recording, for which a charge may be payable. If a transcript is produced it will not include any oral judgment or reasons given at the hearing. The transcript will not be checked, approved or verified by a judge. There is more information in the joint Presidential Practice Direction on the Recording and Transcription of Hearings, and accompanying Guidance, which can be found here: ...
Employer
Employment Details
- Industry
- Education
- Representation
- Litigant in person
Case Details
- Case Number
- 3313160/2023
- Decision Date
- 08/11/2024
- Published
- 24/12/2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- EJ WILSON