Back to search
2203556/2020Dismissed

The Riverside Group Ltd (formerly One Housing Group Ltd)

27 May 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge H Travers
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 43B(1)(b), but dismissed his claims for protected disclosure detriment and automatically unfair dismissal.

Key Issues

  • whether the content of an email dated 10 February 2020 constituted a protected disclosure
  • whether the acts or omissions set out in the Schedule of Detriments took place

Claim Types

Cited Laws and Legal Issues

Employment Rights Act 1996 unfair dismissalEmployment Rights Act 1996

issed his claims for protected disclosure detriment and automatically unfair dismissal.

Protected disclosures / whistleblowingEmployment Rights Act 1996

The tribunal found that the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 43B(1)(b),

Decision Text

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Michael Cameron Respondent: The Riverside Group Limited (formerly One Housing Group Limited) Heard at: East London Hearing Centre On: 19-21 September 2023 Before: Employment Judge H Travers Members: Mr L. Purewal Mr Woodhouse Representation For the Claimant: R. Myers, Barrister, instructed by Direct Access For the Respondent: T. Burton, Barrister, instructed by Trowers and Hamlin LLP JUDGMENT (i) The tribunal finds that the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 43B(1)(b). (ii) The claim of protected disclosure detriment pursuant to the Employment Rights Act 1996 section 47B(1) is dismissed. (iii) The claim of automatically unfair dismissal pursuant to the Employment Rights Act 1996 s103A is dismissed. REASONS Issues 1. At the date of termination of his employment, the claimant had less than 2 years qualifying period of employment. 2 2. By a claim form received by the Tribunal on 16 June 2020, the claimant complains: (a) that his dismissal was automatically unfair contrary to s103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 [‘ERA’] because the reason or the principal reason for his dismissal was that he had made a protected disclosure. (b) That he suffered detriment on the ground that he had made a protected disclosure. The claimant seeks a remedy in respect of both claims. 3. The parties presented the tribunal with a detailed agreed list of issues. In summary, the tribunal must determine:- Public Interest Disclosure (a) Whether the content of an email dated 10 February 2020 (including attachments) constituted a protected disclosure. The email was sent by the claimant to Ms H Milne, the respondent’s Director of Governance and Compliance. (b) Whether the 10 February 2020 email and attachm...

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

The Riverside Group Ltd (formerly One Housing Group Ltd)

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
2203556/2020
Decision Date
27/05/2025
Published
01/08/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge H Travers