Mr U Razzaq T/a Tay Pharmacy

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8002191/2025 Held in Glasgow on 14, 15 and 16 January 2026 Employment Judge L Doherty Mr Murdo MacDonald Claimant In Person Mr Umar Razzaq, trading as Tay Pharmacy Respondent Represented by: Ms E Cho - Counsel JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and the respondents are ordered to pay the claimant a monetary award of £6,344.50 REASONS 1. The claimant presented a claim of constructive unfair dismissal on the 8 September 2025, which was resisted. A three day final hearing took place between 14 and 16 January 2026. The claimant appeared on his own behalf and the respondents were represented by Ms Cho, counsel. The Hearing 2. The claimant gave evidence on his own behalf. Evidence was given on his behalf by Jaquline McGregor (JM), his former line manager. 3. For the respondent, evidence was given by: a. Umar Razzaq -the respondent and the proprietor of the business; b. Roxsanne Fitzpatrick (RF) -Operations Manager for the Respondent; 8002191/2025 Page 2 c. Evelyn Ingham (EI) -Pharmacy Dispenser for the Respondent; and d. Kelsey Gregan (KG) -Operations Support Manager. 4. The parties lodged a joint bundle of documents. The issues Constructive unfair dismissal 5. The issue is whether the respondent breached a fundamental term of the claimant’s contract of employment, in response to which he resigned. 6. Two separate alleged breaches of contact are relied upon. The first term relied upon is that the claimant was entitled to use of the pharmacy delivery vehicle for the purposes of his commute to and from work. This is said to have been breached when he was advised in ...