The Highland Laundry Room Ltd and Mr N Forbes
Case Summary
Claim for lack of statement of particulars, lack of payslip, and unauthorised deductions from wages. Some claims succeed, some dismissed.
Key Issues
- •Statement of Particulars required under Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Payslip required under Employment Rights Act 1996
- •Unauthorised deductions from wages under Employment Rights Act 1996
Claim Types
Decision Text
E.T. Z4 (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) 5 Case No: 8001534/2024 Final Hearing heard at Aberdeen remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 30 January 2026 10 Employment Judge A Kemp 15 Ms Jolanta Ozga Claimant In person 20 The Highland Laundry Room Ltd First Respondent 25 Mr Neil Forbes Second respondent Both represented by: Mr K Ishaq, 30 Litigation Consultant JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL 1. The claim of direct discrimination on the protected characteristic of 35 race under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 is dismissed on withdrawal. 2. The claim as directed against the second respondent is dismissed as a result of that withdrawal. 3. The claim that the respondent is in breach of section 8 of the 40 Employment Rights Act 1996 is dismissed. 8001534/2024 Page 2 4. The claim that the respondent did not provide a statement of particulars in accordance with the terms of sections 1 – 4 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeds. 5. The Tribunal grants a declaration that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the wages of the claimant under section 13 of the 5 Employment Rights Act 1996. 6. The claimant is awarded the sum of EIGHT HUNDRED AND SIX POUNDS NINETY TWO PENCE (£806.92) payable by the respondent to the claimant. 10 REASONS Introduction 1. This was a Final Hearing into claims that originally included direct discrimination. In correspondence prior to the hearing the claimant 15 indicated that she did not wish to pursue that claim, and that was confirmed with her at the commencement of it. The claim for that matter is therefore dismissed and as a result the basis of the claim as directed to the second respondent no longer exists, and is also dismissed. 2. That leaves claims for not having a Statement of Particulars required by 20 sections 1 – 4 of ...
Compensation
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 8001534/2024
- Decision Date
- 05/02/2026
- Published
- 20/03/2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- A Kemp