Sundrax Ltd

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Dzhan Kurt Respondent: Sundrax LTD Heard at: Watford Employment Tribunal via CVP On: 9 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge L Wilson (sitting alone) Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Maria Bragina, Manager JUDGMENT 1. The claim for unpaid wages brought by the claimant is well founded. The respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages in the period January 2024 to June 2024 inclusive, being a total of £16,000.02 gross. The respondent has since paid part of the sum (£3,690.66) to the Claimant. The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £12,309.36 gross. (This differs from the sum which was announced at the hearing, which was £12,570, because the arithmetic has been re-checked). 2. The claim for breach of contract was withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing and is dismissed by the tribunal. Approved by: Employment Judge Wilson 10.2.2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON .24 February 2026...................................... ................................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. If written reasons are provided they will be placed online. All judgments (apart from judgments under Rule 51) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal- decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. If a Tribunal hearing has been recorded, you may request a transcript of the recording. Unless there are exceptional circumstances, you will have to pay for it. If a transcript is produc...