DHL
Case Summary
The claimant's claim was struck out as the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's warning that the claim was at risk of being struck out for lack of active pursuit.
Key Issues
- •claim struck out under Rule 38 for lack of active pursuit
Claim Types
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: S Kell Respondent: DHL JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 21 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Gidney 30 January 2026
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 6010130/2025
- Decision Date
- 30/01/2026
- Published
- 01/03/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gidney