Back to search
6010130/2025Struck Out

DHL

30 January 2026England & WalesEmployment Judge Gidney
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claimant's claim was struck out as the claimant did not respond to the tribunal's warning that the claim was at risk of being struck out for lack of active pursuit.

Key Issues

  • claim struck out under Rule 38 for lack of active pursuit

Claim Types

Unfair Dismissal

Decision Text

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: S Kell Respondent: DHL JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 21 January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Gidney 30 January 2026

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

DHL

View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
6010130/2025
Decision Date
30/01/2026
Published
01/03/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Gidney