Private Equity Insights Ltd
Case Summary
The claimant was employed as a Management Associate and brought claims for holiday pay, unauthorised deductions from wages, and non-reimbursement of expenses. The tribunal found the claims to be well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the relevant amounts.
Key Issues
- •holiday pay
- •unauthorised deductions from wages
- •reimbursement of expenses
Claim Types
Decision Text
Case No: 6008864/2025 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr J Rosbery Respondent: Private Equity Insights Ltd Heard at: London South Employment Tribunal On: 2 February 2026 Before: Employment Judge Bradford Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Mr S Tollak, Director JUDGMENT 1. The complaint in respect of holiday pay is well-founded. The Respondent was in breach of contract in failing to pay the Claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date the claimant’s employment ended. 2. The Respondent shall deduct tax and national insurance from the gross sum of £726.92 and pay the net sum to the Claimant. 3. The Respondent’s counter claim for over-taken holiday is dismissed. 4. The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is well-founded. The Respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages on 31 October 2025 in that the laptop was not agreed in writing as required by s13 Employment Rights Act 1996. 5. The Respondent shall deduct tax and national insurance from the gross sum of £230 and pay the net sum to the Claimant. 6. The Respondent failed to reimburse the Claimant’s expenses which were reasonably incurred on the company’s business. The Respondent shall pay the Claimant the net sum of £27.63. Case No: 6008864/2025 10.7 Judgment with reasons – rule 62 REASONS 1. The Claimant was employed by the Respondent between 19.08.2024 and 31.10.2024 as a Management Associate, when his employment was terminated with one week’s notice during his probation period. By an ET1 filed on 14.03.2025 the Claimant brought claims for holiday pay, unauthorised deductions from wages and ‘other payments’ being his contractual right to re-imbursement of a taxi fare. Holiday pay 2. It was agreed between the parties that the accrued holiday entitlement was 5.7 days. There was a dispute as to whether three ...
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 6008864/2025
- Decision Date
- 02/02/2026
- Published
- 23/03/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford