Mr V Le and UK NRG Ltd

Case No. 6004903/2025 JUDGMENT 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms. LAURA CASHMORE Respondents: (1) Mr. VAN LE (2) UK NRG LIMITED HELD AT: BIRMINGHAM, MIDLANDS WEST EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL (REMOTELY BY CVP Audio) ON: 6 February 2026 BEFORE: EMPLOYMENT JUDGE MANLEY REPRESENTATION For the claimant: In person For the respondent: Mr. Le, acting in person JUDGMENT The judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1. The Respondents have failed to enter any response within the time specified in Rule 17 (1) and accordingly, pursuant to Rule 22 (2) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 a determination of the claim shall be made. The Tribunal finds that it is properly able to determine the following aspects of the claim on the material available to it. 2. Pursuant to Rule 22 (2) the Tribunal has determined that the complaint of automatically unfair dismissal is well founded, and the Claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of her being pregnant. 3. The complaint of direct maternity discrimination is well founded and succeeds. Case No. 6004903/2025 JUDGMENT 2 4. The Tribunal is unable on the material available to determine the appropriate remedy. Accordingly, the issue of remedy and any remaining claims shall be determined at a further hearing pursuant to Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024. Approved by: Employment Judge Manley 06 February 2026 Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments (apart from judgments under rule 52) and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) ...