Jaguar Land Rover Ltd

1 of 6 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Raide Respondent: Jaguar Land Rover Limited PRELIMINARY HEARING Heard at: Birmingham, in public On: 23 January 2026 Before: Employment Judge Camp Appearances For the claimant: in person For the respondent: Mr J Feeny, counsel JUDGMENT 1. All of the claimant’s complaints are dismissed on the basis of res judicata / issue estoppel, alternatively on the basis that they are an abuse of process in accordance with the so-called rule in Henderson v Henderson, apart from: 1.1 the complaints of race discrimination, which complaints are also dismissed, but purely on the basis that they are an abuse of process in accordance with the so-called rule in Henderson v Henderson; 1.2 the complaints of ‘whistleblowing’ detriment set out in paragraphs 5.14.2, 5.14.3 and 5.14.4 of the written record of the preliminary hearing of 13 November 2025, which complaints are made subject to deposit orders, below. 2. It is part of the above decision that the following complaints / proposed complaints are not part of the claimant’s claim, that no application for permission to amend the claimant’s claim to add them has been made, and that any such application would be refused: 2.1 the complaint of victimisation set out in paragraph 5.12.2 of the written record of the preliminary hearing of 13 November 2025. If this complaint were part of the claimant’s claim it would be dismissed as an abuse of process in accordance with the so-called rule in Henderson v Henderson; 2.2 any whistleblowing complaint based on an alleged protected disclosure made on or around 29 October 2024; 2 of 6 2.3 a whistleblowing detriment complaint relying as the detriment on the respondent allegedly instructing the claimant “to cease contact with individuals who had been providing support during this ordeal” that relies, as t...