NHS Highland
Case Summary
The claimant's claim was struck out as she failed to actively pursue the claim and did not provide the tribunal with her new contact details.
Why this outcome?
Not actively pursuedThe claimant failed to actively pursue the claim and did not provide the tribunal with updated contact details, resulting in a strike-out under Rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
Key Issues
- •claim struck out for failure to actively pursue
Claim Types
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge L Wiseman Miss C SutherlandClaimant Nhs HighlandRespondent JUDGMENT The claim is struck out under rule 38 of theEmployment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the groundsthat the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d) REASONS 1. The claimant's solicitors having withdrawn from acting on her behalf, a letter was sent to her on 3 November 2025 on the direction of an Employment Judge asking for confirmation of her intention with regard to this claim. 2. That correspondence has been returned to the Tribunal Office indicating that the claimant no longer resides at the address provided on the ET1. 3. No steps have been taken by the claimant to advise the Tribunal of her new address. In the absence of this information the tribunal cannot communicate with the claimant. The Tribunal have been unable to give the claimant notice under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. 4. The Tribunal assumes in these circumstances that she no longer wishes to pursue her claim, which is struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. Date sent to parties3 December 2025
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 4113088/2015
- Tribunal
- Employment Tribunal
- Level
- First instance
- Decision Date
- 03/12/2025
- Published
- 12/03/2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman