Back to search
3303660/2024Struck Out

Anna Valley Ltd (In administration)

18 July 2025England & WalesEmployment Judge Anstis
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claim was struck out due to the lack of consent from the administrator and permission from the court, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.

Why this outcome?

Jurisdictional bar

The claim was struck out because it did not comply with the statutory requirement under the Insolvency Act 1986 to obtain consent from the administrator and permission from the court before proceeding.

Key Issues

  • proceedings not continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986

Claim Types

Decision Text

Case No. 3303660/2024 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss P Youd Respondent: Anna Valley Ltd (in administration) JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The respondent company is in administration. Neither the consent of the administrator nor the permission of the court has been obtained for these proceedings to be continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. 2. On 4 February 2025 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to give written reasons why the claim should not be struck out as it had not been actively pursued. Further correspondence followed but by today’s date there is no indication that the claimant has either got the administrator’s agreement or a court order. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by Employment Judge Anstis 18 July 2025 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ...14 August 2025................................... ............................................................ FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Anna Valley Ltd (In administration)

Employer page →View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
3303660/2024
Tribunal
Employment Tribunal
Level
First instance
Decision Date
18/07/2025
Published
19/08/2025
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Anstis