The Chief Constable of Cleveland Police and Police and Crime Commissioner for Cleveland

1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr M Dias First Respondent: The Chief Constable of Cleveland Police Second Respondent: Police & Crime Commissioner for Cleveland Heard at: Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre by CVP On: 1 st & 2 nd November 2021 Before: Employment Judge Martin Representation: Claimant: Mr A Rathmel (Counsel) First Respondent: Mr A Moon QC (Counsel) Mr G Powell (Counsel) Second Respondent: Mr S Naughton This case was heard by way of Cloud Video Platform (CVP) due to the on-going Coronavirus pandemic. The parties agreed to the case being heard by way of CVP. RESERVED JUDGMENT 1. The claimant’s complaint of race discrimination is dismissed upon withdrawal. 2. The claimant’s complaints of protected interest disclosure and victimisation in respect of paragraphs 10A, 10B, 10H and 10M of the Further Particulars dated 30 April 2021 are dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. 3. The claimant’s complaints of victimisation and protected interest disclosure in respect of paragraph 10K of the Further Particulars dated 30 April 20221 is hereby dismissed. The tribunal does not consider it has any reasonable prospect of success. 4. The claimant is ordered to pay a deposit order in the sum of £650.00 in respect of each of the remaining allegations of protected interest disclosure and victimisation set out at paragraphs 10B, 10D, 10E, 10F, 10G, 10I, 10J, 10K, 10L of the Further Particulars dated 30 April 2021. The claimant is also ordered to pay a deposit order in the sum of £650.00 in respect of his complaint of disability discrimination – reasonable adjustment; making a total deposit order in the sum of £11.050.00. 2 This tribunal considers that the claimant has little prospect of success in relation to those complaints. REASONS Intr...