Canny Clever IT Service Centres Ltd
Case Summary
The claimant succeeded in claims for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant a total of £2,047.76.
Key Issues
- •unlawful deduction of wages
- •outstanding holiday pay
Claim Types
Decision Text
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: R Shaw Respondent: Canny Clever IT Service Centres Limited JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 22 OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS RULES OF PROCEDURE 2024 (1) The claim for unlawful deduction of wages (arrears of pay) is well founded and succeeds. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £1,487.20. (2) The claim for payment of holiday pay outstanding on termination of employment under regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998 is well founded and succeeds. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of 560.56. (3) The total amount to be paid to the Claimant is £2,047.76 REASONS 1. The Claimant presented an ET1 against the Respondent on 11 June 2025. No Response to the claim was returned by the Respondent. The Claimant’s claim was combined with that of Mr J Abrahams and a case management preliminary hearing in respect of both claims took place on 02 February 2026 before Employment Judge Aspsen. Judge Aspden directed Mr Shaw to provide some further information in respect of his claims by no later than 09 February 2026. Mr Shaw complied with this order on 02 February. Judge Aspden directed that, if the Claimant provided the information, the matter was to be referred to a judge to consider whether, under rule 2022, his claims could be determined without the need for a hearing. Under rule 22 of the Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2024 where on the expiry of the time limit in rule 17 no response has been presented and no application for a reconsideration is outstanding, an employment Judge must decide whether on the available material, a determination can properly be made of the claim or part of it. If there is, the judge must issue a judgment, otherwise a hearing must be fixed before a judge alone. 2. I was satisfied that I had sufficient information to issue a judgment under rule 22 of the ET Rules. 3. The Claimant claimed that he was owed: a. Arrears ...
Compensation
Employer
Case Details
- Case Number
- 2501012/2025
- Decision Date
- 23/02/2026
- Published
- 13/03/2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Sweeney