Back to search
2300833/2022Struck Out

IKNOWA Ltd

13 February 2026England & WalesEmployment Judge Andrews
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claim is struck out as the claimant has not responded to the Tribunal's letter warning of potential strike out under Rule 38.

Key Issues

  • The claim had not been actively pursued

Claim Types

Other

Decision Text

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr D Saka Respondent: IKNOWA LTD JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 29 January 2025, warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that:  The claim had not been actively pursued. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied to the Tribunal’s letter by the reply date of 05 February 2025. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. This is because the claim has not been pursued by the claimant. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Andrews Date: 13 February 2026

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

IKNOWA Ltd

View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
2300833/2022
Decision Date
13/02/2026
Published
06/03/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Andrews