UBS Business Solutions AG

Case No: 2216961/2024 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Arvinder Bhachoo Respondent: UBS Business Solutions AG Heard at: London Central (in person) On: 2, 3, 4 ,5, 10, 11, 12 December 2025 8, 9, 15, 16 December 2025 (in chambers) Before: Employment Judge B Smith (sitting with members) Mr R Baber Mr D Kendall Representation Claimant: Ms A Fadipe (counsel) Respondent: Mr J Crozier (counsel) RESERVED JUDGMENT The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: 1. The complaint of direct race discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed. 2. The complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments is not well- founded and is dismissed. 3. The complaint of victimisation is not well-founded and is dismissed. 4. The complaint of protected disclosure detriment is not well-founded and is dismissed. Case No: 2216961/2024 2 REASONS Introduction 1. The claimant has been employed as a Senior Enterprise Architect at the respondent, a global financial services provider, since 22 December 2017. He remains employed. ACAS conciliation commenced on 10 January 2024 and concluded on 21 February 2024. The claim was presented on 21 March 2024. 2. The claimant brings claims of: (i) Direct race discrimination; (ii) Failure to make reasonable adjustments; (iii) Victimisation; and (iv) Protected disclosure detriment. 3. Disability was in issue. Procedure, documents, and evidence heard 4. The parties were represented by both solicitors and counsel during the final hearing. Solicitors attended throughout for both parties. 5. No adjustments were required or asked for by any of the parties or witnesses. The Tribunal kept this under review and took regular breaks as necessary. No issues around adjustments arose during the hearing. Nonetheless, we understood and took into account the claimant’s mental health in making...