Back to search
1401335/2025Struck Out

Royal Mail Group Ltd

16 February 2026England & WalesEmployment Judge Gray
GOV.UK

Case Summary

The claim is struck out because it appears to the Tribunal that the claim had not been actively pursued and it is a duplicate of a previous claim.

Key Issues

  • The claim had not been actively pursued
  • The claim is a duplicate of claim number 1401309/2025

Claim Types

Other

Decision Text

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: M Hassan Respondent: Royal Mail Group Ltd JUDGMENT The claim is struck out. REASONS 1. The Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 8 th January 2026 warning them that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim. This was because it appeared to the Tribunal, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that:  The claim had not been actively pursued, and it is a duplicate of claim number 1401309/2025. 2. The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing at which to do so. The claimant has not replied. 3. I am satisfied that the grounds for striking out the claim under Rule 38 apply, and that it would be in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3 to strike out the claim. 4. The claim is therefore struck out. Approved by: Employment Judge Gray 16 February 2026 JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 27 February 2026 Jade Lobb FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE

Download full PDF

Employer

Respondent

Royal Mail Group Ltd

View all cases →

Case Details

Case Number
1401335/2025
Decision Date
16/02/2026
Published
17/03/2026
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Judge
Employment Judge Gray