Glasgow City Council

Case Summary

The claimant's claims of direct discrimination, harassment, and victimisation were all dismissed by the Employment Tribunal.

The tribunal heard the claimant's discrimination claims and found them not well-founded, dismissing all claims of direct discrimination, harassment, and victimisation.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •direct discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010
• •harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 related to race and religion
• •victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No:4100564/2024 5 Held inGlasgowon3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 February and 10 April 2025 Employment JudgeC McManus Members I Ashfar and W Muir Ms S Cherry Claimant10 InPerson Glasgow City CouncilRespondent15 Represented by: Mr R Bradley- Advocate JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL20 The unanimous judgment of the Tribunal is that: 1.The claimant’s claim of direct discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 isnot well founded and is dismissed. 2.The claimant’s claims of harassment under section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 related to her protected characteristics of (1) race and (2) religion are not well25 founded and are dismissed. 3.The claimant’s claim of victimisation under section 27 of the Equality Act 2010 is not well founded and is dismissed. REASONS Reasons were given orally at the Hearing.30 Date sent to parties: 17 April 2025