Krinkles UK Ltd (Continental Landscapes)

Case Summary

The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal and discrimination because of religion against Krinkles UK Ltd. The tribunal found that the claimant did not present his claims within the relevant statutory time limits and that it was reasonably practicable for him to have done so for the unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal determined it would not be just and equitable to extend the time limit for the discrimination claim, and therefore dismissed both claims for lack of jurisdiction.

The claimant did not present his claims within the relevant statutory time limits. It was reasonably practicable for him to have presented the unfair dismissal claim within the time limit, and it would not be just and equitable to extend the time limit for the discrimination claim.

Use these claim-type pages to compare this decision with other published tribunal cases, outcome patterns, and visible award data.

• •Whether claims were presented within statutory time limits
• •Whether it was reasonably practicable to present unfair dismissal claim within time limit under s111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
• •Whether just and equitable to extend time limit for discrimination because of religion claim under s123 Equality Act 2010

1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SITTING AT:LONDON SOUTH BY CVP BEFORE:EMPLOYMENT JUDGE MORTON BETWEEN: Mr A Babouri Claimant AND Krinkles UK Ltd (Continental Landscapes) Respondent ON: 30 April 2026 Appearances: For the Claimant: Mr M Babouri, the Claimants son For the Respondent: Mr D Brown, Counsel Judgment 1. The claimant did not present his claims within the relevant statutory time limits. 2. It was reasonably practicable for him to have presented his claim of unfair dismissal within the time limit set out in s111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. 3. It would not be just and equitable to extend the time limit set out in s 123 Equality Act 2010 for the presentation of his claim of discrimination because of religion. 4. The Tribunal does not therefore have jurisdiction to hear the claims and they are hereby dismissed. Approved by: Employment Judge Morton Date: 30 April 2026 2 Judgment sent to the parties and entered in the Register on12 May 2026. For the Tribunal Office:P Wing P Wing Notes Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Public access to employment tribunal decisions Judgments and reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at www.gov.uk/employment- tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimant(s) and respondent(s) in a case.